Skip to main content

Medieval Monday

I still receive quite a few requests to read ebooks, which I often cursorily pass on for more reasons than my reluctance to read full-length stories on screen. Today I’m visiting book production, from past to present, to explain why I do not read ebooks EXCEPT first, to address a few debates on electronic books, let's be clear:
  • I believe ebooks will be with us for a while, if not forever. 
  • Ebooks are also overwhelmingly convenient for avid readers uninterested in building libraries or owning print book products. 
  • I, as well, do not believe that the mere reading books on electronic devices will dumb us down. 
My basic reason for shunning ebooks, incidentally also a key reason for why print books continue to endure, can be traced through a cursory glimpse examining the timeline of book production.

I’m still young enough to remember those big General Electric typewriters; the big humming beauties where a many of secretaries lost fingernails…the ones with the wicked return levers... where you had to use whiteout tape if you made a mistake… the ones where I used to wonder how writers typed whole full-length novels on it!?! Goodness! That had to be dreadful. I could barely type one page without XXX’s covering the paper in so many places that it looked like I was typing a drawing as opposed to typing a story.

Which speaking of writing, back in this time writers were still turning in whole handwritten novels to publishers!

I was so grateful to technology for first coming out with that correction tape, and soon thereafter word-processors, though I longed to purchase ‘the’ computer; a computer where I could type and make corrections with a mere click of hitting the backspace key. And everybody, I’m talking about 1996. That’s how young electronic reading and writing apparatuses are, in comparison to the hundreds of years print books and its associated writing devices have been around.

Technology no doubt has made it very convenient for today’s writers, but there is a flip side to this convenience that is discounted.

Now, had I not visited Wikipedia, fact-checking as to whether or not there may have been earlier books than clay tablets and sticks, stones, and bones on which to create impressions (print) in ‘books’, I may have missed this opportunity to concisely cite the one phrase that amalgamates the primary reason for the arcane discrepancy between electronic books and print books.

Cited from Wikipedia: ‘The book is also linked to the desire of humans to create lasting records.”


  1. It took me FOREVER to get an ereader. I mean, seriously. For the longest time I convinced myself that I could never enjoy the experience until a friend of mine got one and told me I should try it. I did, and I was surprised that I actually had no trouble enjoying books electronically. Of course, I still prefer print books (and even the smell of a new book) but ebooks are just fine for me. But I do know some readers who have not made the transition and actually don't even plan to.

    1. Funny! Me too... even if I don't have an ereader I do like reading books on my phone; though I only have 2 so far... haha... both my books!


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Rumor About One Race

It’s a funny thing, how some things you hear stay with you in that sixth sense sort of way, as if the information will serve some future purpose.

True Story. I was in elementary school when a teacher got to talking about three true races—Caucasian, Mongoloid, and Negroid, and how one day there would be One Race. For a placeholder I attended Philadelphia (PA) Public Schools, K-straight thru-12 (99.98% black student population) where there was always ‘that’ teacher who would put aside a textbook to impart ‘move to the edge of your seat’ information... something I later figured out would take “dynamic positioning” to find its originating source. I even think the teacher may have said we wouldn’t find this information written anywhere.

At any rate, I’m all kinds of fuzzy about how the original three races came to be, but recall 3rd grade hands going up in the air asking why this and how that and what about this, and then somebody saying, “unt un... my mother said...”

Naturally I was intr…

Rhyme to the Reason, Method to the Madness

Over the weekend I came across an article written by Sarah S. Davis @BookRiot. The headline article, 10 Books That Break Genre Rules, naturally caught my attention, and then really revved up my thoughts when I saw one of Truman Capote’s books included in the article. Following with the flow of the article, Capote’s book apparently broke a genre rule by mixing fact with fiction.

Now, I read ‘In Cold Blood’ by Truman Capote years ago...way back when the book was categorized True Crime. Fast forward two decades and I learned the book was a novel, which had me scratching my head, save for waving off the narrative until this article where incidentally, in the same paragraph citing how Capote’s book mixed fact with fiction, also referenced ‘A Million Little Pieces’ (by James Frey).

Without expounding too far on the subject, since this is not exactly where I’m going, yet important to include what inspired writing this post; All literature, strictly classified and by default, break ‘genre’ r…

When Opinions Cross the Line

Two literary topographies brought this historical commentary together; a social media Headline asserting some books are irrelevant, and Stacey Dash’s memoir, ‘There Goes My Social Life’. (My other thoughts here).

I didn't pause long enough to so much as note the social media headline, but did pause after catching wind of Stacey Dash's outspoken stance on supporting American businessman and Republican politician, Mitt Romney. Stacey is an American Actress notable for her role in the film CluelessSIGH—I’ve never seen Clueless, but have seen this actress in other films... which was what inspired me to want to read her memoir. Being a Big Picture thinker, I couldn't make heads or tails out of the hoopla behind her outspoken political views.

My great-great grandfather, born in America in the mid 1800’s, was a Republican. Per my father, historically the American working class primarily voted Republican, though he, and then me, marveled about my great-great grandfather's r…